0

Higher utility rates included in Grandview's 2012 budget

GRANDVIEW - Besides an annual $20 car tab fee on all vehicles, Grandview residents in 2012 will also see higher water and sewer bills.

That's according to a 2012 budget the city council approved last night, Tuesday.

The budget includes a 6 percent hike in the city's water rate and a 7 percent increase in the wastewater rate.

Combined, the increases will cost the typical property owner an additional $3.42 per month. Grandview also raised both water and sewer rates in 2011.

The rate hikes will generate about $220,000 in additional revenue for 2012.

The city's current expense fund, which covers day-to-day expenses, is budgeted at $5 million for 2012.

The fund includes police expenditures in the amount of $2.6 million. That includes 25 new bullet-proof vests and the purchase of six radios.

With an anticipated increase of 11 percent in employee health insurance costs, Grandview is continuing some belt-tightening measures in 2012 that include no cost-of-living wage increases for employees.

Overall, the current expense fund is expected to have a balance of $1.05 million to start 2012 and a balance of $830,045 at the end of 2012.

In a budget overview document Mayor Norm Childress provided to council in October, he said 2012 will also see the replacement of eight vehicles, a laptop computer and the city's municipal accounting system.

The replacement costs will be carried out of the city's equipment rental fund, which is budgeted to spend $542,950 in 2012. Even with the expense, the rental fund is expected to end 2012 with $2.01 million in the account.

Other funds budgeted for next year include $4.8 million to be spent out of the water/sewer fund and $1.06 million out of the solid waste fund.

Comments

Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment