A big new tax coming to your Internet bill?




Since 1998 it has been prohibited by federal law for states and localities to tax Internet access.

This policy, known as the Internet Tax Freedom Act, has been extended three times with broad bipartisan support. But it is set to expire again on Nov. 1, and some Senate Democrats appear willing, this time, to allow it to actually expire if they can’t use it to leverage an unrelated tax issue.

It’s a dangerous game that could cost taxpayers billions of dollars and worsen the digital divide by pricing some lower income Americans off of the Internet entirely.

The House, led by Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, passed a bill last month to make the ban on Internet access taxes permanent. It was a voice vote - meaning not a single member objected.

“The permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act merely prevents Internet access taxes and unfair multiple and discriminatory taxes on e-commerce,” Goodlatte explained on the House floor. “It does not tackle the issue of Internet sales taxes.”

And that, for many senators, is the problem.

The Senate has already passed a highly controversial bill authorizing states to collect sales taxes on out-of-state purchases called the Marketplace Fairness Act. But that bill - which is popular with retailers but not with most consumers, for obvious reasons - has not moved in the House.

Before the Senate left for its August recess, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas made a motion for the Senate to, like the House, unanimously pass a permanent extension of the ban on Internet access taxes.

“One of the reasons the Internet has been such an entrepreneurial haven is that Congress has wisely decided to keep it free from taxation, not to subject the Internet to taxation,” Cruz said.

Unlike the House, however, his request was met not just with an objection but a rather emphatic one, voiced by Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, likely on behalf of Senate Democratic leaders.

Heitkamp began with concerns that the bipartisan, 18-year policy of banning Internet access taxes potentially infringed the “sovereign right of states and local governments under the 10th Amendment,” an unusual concern from a liberal Democrat who supports national labor, environmental and health care laws.

It also implies a misunderstanding of the purpose of the commerce clause, which as Cato scholar Roger Pilon often points out was intended to empower Congress to regulate or “make regular” interstate commerce by striking down barriers…like Internet access taxes.

Then she got to her real point: holding the successful, wildly popular ban on Internet access taxes hostage to their desire to force the House to authorize Internet sales taxes.

“I believe we too need to address the Internet tax moratorium which expires on Nov. 1,” Heitkamp said.

“But…we also need to have a discussion in this context of commerce clause responsibility, to give the states the right to decide whether they are, in fact, going to collect state and local taxes and use taxes.”

A use tax is the term for a tax owed on out-of-state purchases for which sales tax is not collected.

While the ban on Internet access taxes enjoys nearly universal support, the idea of facilitating Internet sales tax is widely opposed by the public and is highly controversial in Congress.

It is unlikely that issue will be resolved before the Nov. 1 deadline, and therefore bringing it into the discussion is a dangerous game that risks allowing the ban on access taxes to expire.

That would be a disaster.

The liberal Center of Budget and Policy Priorities has estimated the impact of allowing states and localities to tax Internet access as a $7 billion tax hike, assuming states and localities tax Internet access like other services.

But Katie McAuliffe of Americans for Tax Reform warns that the tax bite could be much bigger: “The average sales tax rate on voice services is 17 percent, and 12 percent on video services, while the average general sales tax rate is 7 percent,” she notes.

Higher bills mean many Americans, including children, could lose access to the Internet entirely. As Goodlatte observed on the House floor, former White House Chief Economist Austan Goolsbee has calculated that even a 1 percent tax on Internet access would reduce demand 2.75 percent.

The Internet Tax Freedom Act has never been controversial before and shouldn’t be controversial now. Senate Democrats need to stop playing games and approve the House bill immediately when they return from their summer vacation.

‑ The columns of Phil Kerpen,

the president of the American Commitment and the author

of “Democracy Denied,” are

distributed by Cagle Cartoons, Inc.



Comments

Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

robbie 3 years, 2 months ago

As for me, i think the Senate shouldn’t allow the Internet Tax Freedom Act to expire. Refusing to renew the Act would cost taxpayers a lot of money, and force some lower income Americans off the internet for good. According to the Daily Sun News, Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, passed a bill on the ban of internet taxes permanent. The Democrats had a voice vote - meaning not a single member objected. “The permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act merely prevents internet access taxes and unfair multiple and discriminatory taxes on e-commerce. It does not tackle the issue of internet sales taxes,” Goodlatte explained on the House floor.

So my question for you people who are looking at the article: Should we pay for internet access taxes? Look at the people who have a low income who need internet access? What if they need to work on their work from the job they have? If taxes on internet were to be allowed by states, Americans with low income would have to pay a lot more then they should. What if they have children they need to care for? Why would they decide if they should tax internet access now? If they are debating that they should tax internet access now, then why didn’t they tax it before?

If they are going to agree to not tax internet it should stay that way in my opinion! Yes the Internet Tax Freedom Act is going to expire, but they gotta keep in mind what it might do to everyone. They can’t care for their children, maybe they can’t care for themselves…

  Look at companies. They need internet for their employees to work. If companies had to pay tax for their internet that would cost them millions of dollars! They would have to cut back on the income of their employees, causing them to stress because they might have children. Taxing internet is a chain reaction. Not the good kind of chain reaction, but the kind that can end horribly. It can cause minor local or state companies to go bankrupt. Families won’t have enough money to give the support to the their own children.

    This is why i say don’t tax internet access. In my opinion, its just a way to get money out of people. So whoever is reading this should agree that state and localities shouldn’t tax internet access...
0

Sign in to comment