Idea pitched to fund a third 144-car ferry

OLYMPIA - The state House of Representatives wants to set aside $50 million to spend on the construction of a new 144-car ferry.

The money is included in the House supplemental budget for transportation. However, approval of the money is contingent on passage of another bill now in the Senate.

House Bill 1129 aims to fund a third 144-car ferry by charging a service fee on all vehicles registered in Washington.

Dubbed the “peanut butter cup bill” during last year’s session, the bill combines what primary sponsor Rep. Jeff Morris describes as two good things that go well together. It includes money for new ferries and makes tab service fees the same for private businesses and public offices.

The Department of Licens-ing contracts with a number of private businesses to offer vehicle and vessel title registration services, but these businesses must charge a $5 administrative fee. The bill proposes that public offices do the same, in addition to a $12 fee applied to title transactions.

Morris (D-Mount Vernon) said that this bill would “…level the playing field,” charging drivers the same amount whether they renew or purchase tabs at a private business or at a government office like a state licensing office or county courthouse.

Revenue from the new fees is expected to be about $11 million in the first year (2015), and about $22.8 million per year for the four years after that.

The Washington state ferries budget already includes money to construct two 144-car ferries. The extra fees proposed in this bill would help pay for a third ferry.. However, the fee revenue in its second year, about $22.8 million, is only about 19 percent of the cost of the third ferry, $123 million.

David Moseley, ferries assistant secretary, said the new service fee would cover the full cost of building the new ferry because the ferries department would finance a bond. The fee would have to be in place for the next several years to pay off that bond.

Lawmakers from around the state expressed criticism and praise for the bill during the House floor debate.

Rep. Ed Orcutt (R-Kalama) said he doesn’t like that all drivers across the state would have to pay the fee.

“I think it’s a little unfair to ask people who are driving vehicles in all other parts of the state to pay for ferry construction,” he said.

But Rep. Maureen Walsh (R-Walla Walla) took a broader view of public funding for ferries as part of the state highway system.

“Sometimes we have to step up and recognize and realize that [ferries] are assets in our state,” she said.

The Senate, like the House, passed its transportation supplemental budget. Unlike the House budget, however, it doesn’t include any money for a third 144-car ferry.

Morris said he remains optimistic that his bill will meet with Senate approval.

“It’s not a done deal,” he said. “But right now I’m hopeful that there’s a lot of bipartisan support for it.”

‑ Rebecca Gourley is an intern for the WNPA Olympia News Service.


Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment