Return to rule of law is not ‘cruel’


Susan Stamper Brown

Those in freak-out mode who say it is cruel for President Trump to phase out former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, edit should take a deep breath.

Otherwise, it will be impossible for them to separate logic from emotion long enough to understand that the Trump Administration is returning America to the rule of law rather than allowing the law to be ruled by emotions.

This six-month phase-out of Obama’s illegal executive branch overreach program rightly returns immigration laws to the Congress.

Trump made his intentions clear Sept. 5 when he said, “I have a great heart for the folks we are talking about, a great love for them... Hopefully, now, Congress will help them and do it properly.” As editor Guy Benson aptly points out, “The Trump administration clearly stated yesterday that they will not be ‘targeting’ these young people or reshuffling their enforcement priorities.”

Obama, who regularly referred to himself as a “constitutional law professor,” knew better. Now, he opines on social media to much oohing and aahing, that rescinding his temporary DACA is “wrong,” “self-defeating” and “cruel.”

Seems to me, it was “wrong” for Democrats, who could’ve done something about immigration, but didn’t when they owned Washington during Obama’s first term. According to NBC News, 2010 was “the one REAL moment of the Obama first term when immigration was possible, it was Senate Democratic leaders who weren’t ready to give up the politics of the issue. And the White House didn’t fight.”

Wasn’t it “cruel” Obama waited until re-election time to create a temporary program like DACA to garner the Hispanic vote. Likewise, it seems nauseously “self-defeating” that Obama blamed his action on Congress’ inaction. Might it be immoral to offer false hope to “dreamers” and potentially the thousands of illegal immigrant children from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala who flooded our borders reportedly to escape violence after DACA was publicized?

The last I checked, presidents aren’t allowed to bulldoze over the U.S. Constitution and rewrite laws simply because they disagree with them. Obama said he was against that sort of thing before he was for it.

Remarkably, documents 22 times Obama said he “couldn’t ignore or create his own immigration law,” including in 2010 when he said this: “[T]here are those in the immigrants’ rights community who have argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are [here] illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws on the books and put an end to deportation until we have better laws...

“I believe such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. And it would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally. Ultimately, our nation, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and set laws for residency and citizenship. And no matter how decent they are, no matter their reasons, the 11 million who broke these laws should be held accountable.”

That changed in 2012 when Obama forsook his oath to ensure that “laws be faithfully executed” — and crowned himself as proverbial king.

Obama justified DACA on the authority of “prosecutorial discretion,” but, as Fox News’ Gregg Jarrett recently expressed, it is more accurate Obama was “distorting” prosecutorial discretion.

Legal experts agree DACA won’t stand up in court when challenged because, as Attorney General Jeff Sessions said, “Such an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise.”

Although Obama’s words are easy on the ears and lull the naive to sleep, those who are “woke” understand today Obama’s words fan the flame of ignorance while his policies continue to divide and damage America.

— Susan Stamper Brown lives in Alaska and writes about culture, politics and current events. Contact her by Facebook or at


Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment