Carbon tax plan advances

Gov. Jay Inslee’s pet project gets by on 4-2 vote

photo

Sen. Doug Ericksen

— A revised carbon tax bill pushed by Gov. Jay Inslee passed the state Senate Energy, Environment, and Technology Committee on a 6-4 vote last Thursday.

Last month, Inslee proposed a $20 per ton of emitted carbon tax on businesses, with exemptions for certain manufacturers, agricultural industries and airplane jet fuel.

His plan calls for funneling revenues into clean energy infrastructure projects, forestry and assistance for low-income families dealing with increased energy costs and individuals displaced from jobs as a result of the tax.

Inslee has pushed a carbon tax several times in recent years, with no success.

The amended substitute version of the bill, Senate Bill 6203, calls for a tax rate to $10 per ton starting in July 2019, increasing annually by $2 per ton starting in 2021 until it reaches a cap of $30 per ton.

In 2030, the state Department of Commerce will make recommendations to the Legislature on the bill’s impact on carbon reductions and whether to reduce or raise the tax rate.

The original proposal had no cap and an annual 3 percent increase plus adjustments for inflation.

“This is a much more modest proposal,” said Sen. Reuven Carlyle, D-Seattle, chairman of the Senate Energy, Environment, and Technology Committee.

“We have never been at this phase, even getting it out of the policy committee,” said Sen. Kevin Ranker, D-Orcas Island, a co-sponsor of the legislation. “This is a monumental step for us to take serious climate action.”

The substitute version also creates a rural economic development account — which will take in 15 percent of the annual tax revenues — and prohibits local governments from passing their own taxes on carbon emissions.

The measure would also reduce state car tab fees for vehicle owners whose income is 200 percent under the federal poverty level.

During the meeting, the committee passed several amendments as well, including an exemption for aluminum refineries and aluminum producers, which was sponsored by Carlyle.

The package still faces obstacles.

Senate and House Democratic leadership, while publicly open to the concept of a carbon tax, have not named it as a priority piece of legislation they want to pass during this session.

During the Feb. 1 committee meeting, Sen. Steve Hobbs, D-Lake Stevens, voted against the proposal, arguing it amounted to a “pretty sizable gas tax increase.”

House and Senate Republican leadership has been largely opposed to the tax.

Sen. Doug Ericksen, R-Ferndale, who voted against the bill in committee, called it a job killer that would drive manufacturers out of the state and condemned a variety of exemptions written into the legislation as “shocking” and “appalling.”

“What you’re doing is exempting the companies that have the most lobbyists,” he said.

Ericksen had offered an amendment to strip the bill of all exemptions, which was voted down by the committee.

Meanwhile, environmental advocacy groups are threatening to put a carbon tax initiative before voters on the 2018 fall ballot.

In 2016, voters turned down a carbon tax ballot initiative with only about 40 percent in favor.

At a Jan. 30 press conference, Gov. Jay Inslee called upon lawmakers to pass a carbon tax, citing carbon emission reduction targets passed by the Legislature in 2008.

“It has been almost a decade since this Legislature promised people they would take care of their clean air and lungs, and they haven’t done it,” he said. “It is time for the Legislature to do this job. And I expect them to do it.”

The bill now goes to the Senate Ways and Means Committee for further consideration.

Carbon tax proponents in the House are waiting for the bill to pass the Senate before advancing any legislation in their own chamber.



Comments

Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment