Reasons to question climate change

GUEST COLUMN

photo

David Rothbard

photo

Craig Rucker

Many people are actively worried about global warming. And it frustrates them that skeptics and “deniers” refuse to acknowledge the “science” of the so-called manmade problem.

But there may be valid reasons to dispute the theory man is responsible for climate change. And to demonstrate why the issue isn’t clearcut, here’s a basic climate question to ponder:

As the level of carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere increases, does its ability to absorb heat increase, decrease or remain the same?

Most people will assume the answer is “increase.” After all, it’s a “greenhouse” gas. Adding more of it to the atmosphere, should mean more heat being “trapped.”

The correct answer, however, is decrease. 

How do we know this?

Because the United Nation’s very own, Al Gore-friendly Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has acknowledged in its reports that carbon-dioxide loses the ability to absorb heat as its concentration increases.

The gas follows a “logarithmic dependence,” which means that it takes ever-doubling amounts of carbon-dioxide to keep adding the same amount of heat absorption in the atmosphere.

In fact, carbon-dioxide absorbs only a certain narrow spectrum of infrared radiation, and this band is already “saturated.”

People who fret about manmade warming may find it hard to believe carbon-dioxide actually loses “heat trapping” ability. But they should know that even the very climate-concerned IPCC admits to such limitations.

They still argue that we need to fear manmade warming, however. And their reason is simply that they believe any additional heat absorbed will be greatly amplified by water vapor feedback.

This begs the question, are they right?  The answer is “No.”

Water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas of the atmosphere — and responsible for most of the warming that keeps the Earth habitable.

In order to make their case, the IPCC theorizes any additional warming from carbon-dioxide will lead to more water vapor in the atmosphere. And this water vapor will trap more heat, raising temperatures further.

It is this “feedback loop” that is used to justify their predictions of catastrophic, future warming. It’s an interesting concept, but it contains an inherent problem.

Water vapor added to the atmosphere inevitably transitions to clouds. And cumulus clouds not only reflect solar radiation back into space but also produce rain. And rainfall not only cools surface temperatures but also scrubs carbon-dioxide out of the atmosphere.

This is why water vapor feedback remains heavily debated in the scientific community, and even the IPCC admits that “an uncertainty range arises from our limited knowledge of clouds and their interactions with radiation.” 

One thing we can all agree on, though, is that the Earth has warmed over the past 150 years, and by roughly 0.85 degrees Celsius. But the cause of this warming may well be the significant increase in solar activity during that time.

In 2016, Norwegian scientists Harald Yndestad and Jan-Erik Solheim reported that solar output during the 20th Century reached the highest levels in 4,000 years. And also in 2016, at least 132 peer-reviewed scientific papers suggested a solar influence on climate.

The IPCC rejects claims of solar variability, though. They argue changes in solar “irradiance” (brightness) are relatively small. But recent research from scientists like Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark demonstrates variations in the sun’s output also affect the solar magnetic field and solar wind — which directly influence ionization in the troposphere and cloud formation.

As the IPCC observed in its first assessment report in 1990, global climate in recent millennia “has fluctuated over a range of up to 2 degrees Celsius on time scales of centuries or more.”

It’s very possible that the heightened solar activity of the past century has driven recent global warming. As such, there are valid reasons to question the theory of manmade climate change, and to urge greater study of the issue.

— David Rothbard is president and Craig Rucker is executive director of CFACT, a Washington, DC-based public-policy organization founded in 1985.



Comments

Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment